Change Control Software | Kintavo
MODULE 17 / 19

Change Control

Every change documented, assessed, and approved.

Impact assessments that actually see your system — proposed changes list every affected document, training record, and validation before approval.

✓Impact analysis ✓Approval routing ✓Validation links ✓Effectivity dates
See it in a demo ← All 19 modules
Change Control — connected records LIVE
CC-078 Impact: 3 docs, 12 trainings, 1 validation ASSESSED
CC-081 Reagent supplier change · in routing IN REVIEW
CC-074 Effectivity date set · training complete EFFECTIVE
CC-069 Post-change review · no drift detected VERIFIED
THE PROBLEM

An Undocumented Change Is a Deviation Waiting to Be Discovered.

Changes happen everywhere: a supplier substitutes a component, a method parameter drifts, an instrument is replaced. Managed by email, half of them are assessed after implementation — and some are discovered by an auditor comparing records, which converts a routine change into a finding about your quality system itself.

The expensive part is not the paperwork. It is the unassessed downstream impact: the SOP that still describes the old method, the training nobody assigned, the validation that quietly lapsed.

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

What ICH Q10, ISO 13485, and Part 820 Require From Change Control

ICH Q10 names change management as one of four pillars of the pharmaceutical quality system — proposed changes evaluated, approved by dedicated authority, and reviewed after implementation. ISO 13485 and Part 820 require design and process changes to be verified or validated, and documented before implementation. EU GMP chapter 1 expects the same discipline for any change that could affect product quality.

An email chain meets none of these. Kintavo meets all of them by construction — impact assessment, routed approval, and verified action items are the workflow, not an attachment to it.

WHAT AUDITORS WRITE UP
! Changes implemented before approval — the timestamps tell the story every time.
! Impact assessments that missed affected documents, training, or validation status.
! Post-implementation reviews that never happened once the pressure was off.
! No linkage between the change and the deviations that followed it.
WHAT KINTAVO REPLACES

The old way, retired.

Change requests by email → Structured requests with classification and routing
Impact assessed from memory → Guided assessment across documents, training, validation, and risk
Approval by reply-all → Signed approval by designated authority, in sequence
Actions tracked in a spreadsheet → Verified action items that gate closure
Effectiveness assumed → Scheduled post-implementation review with evidence
EVIDENCE, NOT CLAIMS

This is the actual screen.

Change Control in Kintavo — product screenshot
SHOWN WITH SAMPLE DATA
CORE CAPABILITIES

Assessed Before. Verified After. Signed Throughout.

Change Classification
Minor, major, critical — classification drives the route, the approvers, and the depth of assessment required.
Guided Impact Assessment
A structured walk across affected documents, training, equipment, validation, and risk files — so nothing is assessed from memory.
Routed Approval
Sequential or parallel signatures by designated authority, with the assessment in front of every approver.
Action Item Tracking
SOP revisions, training assignments, requalification — each an owned, dated task that must close before the change does.
Post-Implementation Review
Scheduled effectiveness review with evidence attached, not a checkbox.
Full Cross-Linkage
The change record links the documents it revised, the training it triggered, and the deviations that reference it.
IN PRACTICE

A reagent supplier discontinues a component. The lab manager opens a change request; classification lands it as major. The guided assessment flags two SOPs, a validation protocol, and six people needing training. Approvals route to quality and the medical director. Each action item is an owned task; the change cannot close until all verify. Three months later, the scheduled review confirms QC performance held — with the control chart attached.

NOT A SILO

Part of one connected system.

Change Control shares the same data model, AI engine, and audit trail as the other eighteen modules — so its records see, and are seen by, everything else in your quality system.

INTELLIGENCE AI Smart Assist™ Semantic search and gap detection across every record. Explore → INTELLIGENCE 360° Compliance Map™ See how every record connects to everything else. Explore → INTELLIGENCE Audit Intelligence™ Surface compliance gaps before inspectors find them. Explore →
COMMON QUESTIONS

Change Control FAQ

Can change control gate on validation status?

Yes. Action items include verification and validation tasks, and the change cannot close until they are complete and signed — so nothing goes live unvalidated.

How does Kintavo prevent changes before approval?

Timestamps and workflow. Implementation tasks are not released until approvals complete, and the record shows the sequence — which is exactly what an auditor checks.

Does a change automatically update affected documents and training?

The guided assessment identifies them, and closing the change requires the linked SOP revisions and training assignments to be complete. Nothing depends on someone remembering.

Can we configure our own change categories and routes?

Yes — categories, approval matrices, and assessment checklists are configured to your SOPs by your own team in the Workflow Builder.

See Change Control run on your workflows.

Bring your last change request. Leave with it assessed, routed, and closed properly.

Book a Personalized Demo
RELATED All 19 modules → Compare platforms → Pricing → Who runs on Kintavo →