ISO 22000 Compliance Software for Food Safety Mana | Kintavo
← ALL FRAMEWORKS
COMPLIANCE COVERAGE

{{ c.h1 }}

{{ c.sub }}

{{ chip }}
THE PROBLEM

The FSMS Exists in a Binder. The Plant Runs on Clipboards.

ISO 22000 certification is documented in a food safety manual, but the system it describes — hazard controls monitored, deviations corrected, suppliers verified, communication up and down the chain — runs on paper checklists and tribal knowledge. The certification audit samples the gap: the 2 a.m. CCP check that didn’t happen, the corrective action that fixed the symptom, the PRP verification behind schedule.

FSSC 22000 and FSMA raise the sampling intensity — unannounced audits and FDA preventive controls inspections test whether the plan runs, not whether it reads well.

WHAT THE STANDARD REQUIRES

What ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000 Require From the FSMS

ISO 22000 requires hazard analysis with control measures validated before use (clause 8.5), PRPs and CCPs/OPRPs monitored with defined criteria (8.5.4, 8.9), corrections and corrective actions on deviation with cause analysis (8.9.2–8.9.3), a traceability system (8.3), verification activities on schedule (8.8), and management review with defined inputs (9.3). FSSC 22000 layers additional requirements — food defense, food fraud, allergen management — audited unannounced.

Kintavo turns the manual into the operation: monitoring issued to the line and signed at the reading, deviations opening dispositions and root-caused actions, and verification schedules that escalate — evidence generated hourly, audited whenever.

WHAT AUDITORS LOOK FOR
CCP monitoring gaps — the missed check found by the auditor, not the supervisor.
Corrective actions without cause analysis — the same deviation next quarter.
Supplier verification resting on unverified COAs.
Traceability exercises that miss the four-hour target.
WHAT KINTAVO REPLACES
CCP checks on clipboards → Monitoring signed at the line, escalated on miss
Corrections as memos → Root-caused corrective action with verification
Supplier files in a drawer → Risk-classed verification enforced at receiving
Verification by calendar reminder → Scheduled activities that escalate when missed
Mock recalls rebuilt from paper → Lot records linked at receiving and consumption
CORE CAPABILITIES

The FSMS, Running on the Line.

CCP & OPRP Monitoring (8.5.4)
Checks issued on schedule with limits and signatures — a miss escalates within the hour.
PRP Management
Sanitation, pest control, and maintenance programs as scheduled, verified tasks.
Correction & Corrective Action (8.9)
Out-of-limit events with product disposition, cause analysis, and verified actions.
Supplier Verification
Risk-classed approval, COA checks at receiving, scorecards from rejection data.
Traceability (8.3)
Lot records created at receiving and linked at consumption — the documentation a traceability exercise draws on.
Verification & Review (8.8, 9.3)
Verification schedules enforced; management review inputs generated from live data.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE IN PRACTICE

The unannounced FSSC audit starts at the metal detector. Monitoring records: continuous, signed at the reading, one 3 a.m. miss — escalated within the hour, completed late with reason, product from the window held and dispositioned. The auditor requests a traceability exercise: the receiving and consumption records for the sampled lot are linked and exportable, and the exercise proceeds from records instead of a paper chase. The finding list stays empty.

EVIDENCE, NOT CLAIMS

Six Months of CCP Records. Zero Gaps. Four Minutes.

Every check carries its operator, timestamp, reading, and limit — created at the line. When the FSSC auditor samples a season of monitoring, the record is continuous because the workflow made it so.

Receiving and consumption records, timestamped and signed
SHOWN WITH SAMPLE DATA. YOUR NUMBERS APPEAR THE DAY YOU CONNECT YOUR SYSTEM.

Covered as architecture — not configured after the fact.

{{ p.tag }}
{{ p.title }}
{{ p.desc }}
MODULES THAT CARRY THE LOAD
{{ m.name }}→
WHO WORKS UNDER IT
{{ i.name }}→ Check your readiness in 3 minutes →
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

ISO 22000 FAQ

Can Kintavo run our HACCP plan under ISO 22000?
Yes — CCPs and OPRPs become scheduled monitoring with limits, signatures, and escalation; the plan document and the running workflow revise together under change control.
Does Kintavo support FSSC 22000 additional requirements?
Food defense, fraud mitigation, and allergen programs run as the same scheduled, verified task structure — with the records unannounced audits sample.
How does Kintavo support a mock recall?
Receiving and consumption records are created linked, so a traceability exercise works from connected records with an export for the exercise report.
Does this align with FSMA preventive controls?
Yes — the monitoring, corrective action, verification, and supplier verification records ISO 22000 requires are the same evidence FDA’s preventive controls rule inspects.

{{ c.cta }}

Book a Personalized Demo